ArticleEcoHealth2026
Detection of Coccidioides immitis in Archived Soils from Madera County, California.
Article in EcoHealth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In the 1970s, archaeologists excavating sites in Madera County, California, which is now submerged by Hensley Reservoir, contracted coccidioidomycosis (Valley fever), a fungal disease caused by Coccidioides immitis. Soil samples from these sites were archived but not processed due to concerns about infectious arthroconidia. This study investigates whether these decades-old samples, stored at room temperature, still contain Coccidioides and pose a risk to researchers and collections managers. We analyzed 176 subsamples using molecular and culture-based methods, with DNA extractions performed in duplicate across two laboratories. Results confirmed the continued presence of Coccidioides DNA, indicating that long-term archived soils can retain infectious potential. Based on these findings, we developed protocols for safe handling of such materials. Our work highlights the intersection of environmental exposure, occupational health, and Coccidioides' persistence in soil. It underscores the need for biosafety measures when handling archived soils from endemic regions, especially those of archaeological interest. Individuals working with these materials, whether in field settings or museum collections, may be at risk of exposure and illness without proper precautions. This study provides a framework for assessing and mitigating risks associated with archived soils and contributes to broader discussions on environmental reservoirs of fungal pathogens. By combining culture-based and molecular approaches, we demonstrate the importance of proactive safety protocols in protecting public and occupational health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42802212What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.