ArticleInternational wound journal2026
The Relationship Between Subepidermal Moisture Assessment and Pain Measurements in Predicting Pressure Ulcer Development in At-Risk Adults.
Article in International wound journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The relationship between subepidermal moisture (SEM) assessment and pain as early indicators of pressure ulcer development remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the association between SEM, pain, and visual skin assessment (VSA) in adults at risk of pressure ulcer development. A prospective cohort study was undertaken in a medical-surgical ward of an acute hospital in Dublin, Ireland. Adults identified as being at risk of pressure ulcer development or scheduled for surgery requiring a minimum two-night stay were recruited following informed consent. Participants underwent SEM assessment, pain assessment, and VSA at baseline and daily for three consecutive days. Spearman's rank correlation coefficient was used to examine relationships between SEM, pain, and VSA. Thirty-seven participants were included, with a mean age of 63 years (SD 17.88); 59.5% were male. The incidence of pressure ulcer development identified through VSA was 5.4% (n = 2), whereas SEM identified abnormalities in 89.2% (n = 33) of participants. A negligible correlation was observed between pain and SEM measurements, and between pain and VSA. SEM values varied across Fitzpatrick skin types; however, no consistent relationship between skin tone and SEM measurements was observed. These findings indicate that pain may have limited utility as an early indicator of pressure ulcer development. SEM identified tissue abnormalities more frequently than VSA and appeared to perform consistently across skin tones, supporting its potential role in the early detection of pressure-related tissue damage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.