ArticleCancer science2026
Perioperative Durvalumab for Resectable NSCLC: Updated Outcomes for Japanese Patients in AEGEAN.
Article in Cancer science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03800134 (A Phase III, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multi-center International Study of Neoadjuvant/Adjuvant Durvalumab for the Treatment of Patients With Resectable Stages II and III Non-small Cell Lung Cancer), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase III, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multi-center International Study of Neoadjuvant/Adjuvant Durvalumab for the Treatment of Patients With Resectable Stages II and III Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (AEGEAN)
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In the phase 3 AEGEAN study, perioperative durvalumab plus neoadjuvant chemotherapy significantly improved the primary endpoints of event-free survival (EFS) and pathological complete response (pCR) in patients with resectable NSCLC versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone. We report prespecified exploratory Japanese subgroup analyses of EFS, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) (interim analyses; data cut-off [DCO] May 10, 2024); pCR (final analysis; DCO November 10, 2022); and safety. In this double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 79 treatment-naïve Japanese patients (stage II-IIIB[N2]) were randomized (1:1) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus durvalumab/placebo (every 3 weeks [Q3W], 4 cycles) pre-surgery, then adjuvant durvalumab/placebo (Q4W, 12 cycles). Efficacy was analyzed in the modified intention-to-treat population (N = 64; durvalumab arm n = 30, placebo arm n = 34), which excluded patients with documented EGFR/ALK aberrations. At the corresponding data cutoffs, EFS benefit favored the durvalumab arm (unstratified HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.26-1.45; median follow-up, 42 months [censored patients]), and the pCR rate was numerically higher with durvalumab versus placebo (33.3% vs. 5.9%). A clinically meaningful DFS improvement favored the durvalumab arm (unstratified HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.16-1.21); however, no difference in OS was observed (unstratified HR 1.01, 95% CI 0.40-2.51). Grade 3/4 adverse events occurred in 62.2% and 65.9% of patients with durvalumab and placebo, respectively. Improvements in EFS and pCR with perioperative durvalumab plus neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone were comparable to, or greater than, those observed in the global study population, supporting this regimen as a treatment option for Japanese patients. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.Gov Identifier NCT03800134.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.