Observational studyPediatric obesity2026
Obesity Disparities in California Vary by School Ethnic Segregation and School Neighbourhood Income.
Observational study in Pediatric obesity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study examines how ethnic disparities in childhood obesity differ across combinations of school ethnic composition and school neighbourhood income in California, to identify the contexts in which disparities are greatest. Prior studies have been unable to study this due to the high correlation between segregation and income.
methodsThis observational study focuses on overweight/obesity data objectively measured among California public school children in 2018/2019 and school neighbourhood data from the American Community Survey, using a 'within versus between' differences analysis.
resultsBlack and Latino children had higher overweight/obesity prevalence than White children, but disparities varied across schools. Disparities were smallest in integrated low-income schools: the Black versus White (B/W) and the Latino versus White (L/W) disparities were 3% and 10%, respectively. In integrated high-income schools, these disparities were 8% and 13%, respectively. Disparities between segregated low-income schools and segregated high-income schools were 11% (B/W) and 14% (L/W), and 22% (B/W) and 26% (L/W). The largest disparity was between minority children in minority-segregated low-income schools compared to White children in White-segregated high-income schools (B/W disparity 23% and L/W 28%).
conclusionsPlace-based interventions to reduce childhood obesity should prioritize low-income, ethnically segregated schools, where the largest disparities were observed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.