Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42801755›Full record

ArticleChemistry & biodiversity2026

Bio-Based Potential of Phenolic-Rich Fabaceae Seeds (Gonocytisus angulatus, Podocytisus caramanicus): Chemical Standardization, Functional Screening, and Molecular Insights.

Burak Bayrak, Ferhat Güneş, Beyzanur Akyüz, Elif Beyza Özer, Amenah Imad Abdulqader, Ayşe Çivaş, İsranur Küçüksu, Hatice Rümeysa Sönmez, Ömer Çeçen, Bilge Aydın and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chemistry & biodiversity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Burak BayrakDepartment of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Atatürk University, Erzurum, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6550-6916
Ferhat GüneşDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Atatürk University, Erzurum, Türkiye.
Beyzanur AkyüzDepartment of Pharmaceutical Botany, Faculty of Pharmacy, Atatürk University, Erzurum, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-8748-790X
Elif Beyza ÖzerDepartment of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Samsun, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7484-1126
Amenah Imad AbdulqaderDepartment of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Atatürk University, Erzurum, Türkiye.
Ayşe ÇivaşDepartment of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Atatürk University, Erzurum, Türkiye.
İsranur KüçüksuDepartment of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Atatürk University, Erzurum, Türkiye.
Hatice Rümeysa SönmezDepartment of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Atatürk University, Erzurum, Türkiye.
Ömer ÇeçenDepartment of Biology, Kamil Özdağ Faculty of Science, Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey University, Karaman, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1315-9876
Bilge AydınDepartment of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Erzincan Binali Yıldırım University, Erzincan, Türkiye.
Furkan ÇobanDepartment of Field Crops, Faculty of Agriculture, Atatürk University, Erzurum, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2815-8988
Hafize YucaDepartment of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Atatürk University, Erzurum, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0857-4776
Songül KarakayaDepartment of Pharmaceutical Botany, Faculty of Pharmacy, Atatürk University, Erzurum, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3268-721X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study comparatively evaluated the phytochemical composition and bioactivities of methanolic extracts and aqueous decoctions obtained from seeds of two Fabaceae taxa (Gonocytisus angulatus, Podocytisus caramanicus). Aqueous decoction yielded higher extraction efficiencies (up to 39.20%), whereas methanolic extraction recovered a broader range of phenolic compounds. Phytochemical analysis revealed that flavonoids and phenolic acids were the dominant constituents, with chlorogenic acid, rutin, quercetin, kaempferol, and gallic acid as the major compounds, particularly enriched in methanolic extracts. In vitro assays demonstrated moderate enzyme inhibitory effects. The highest α-glucosidase inhibition was observed in the methanolic extract (20.22%), while α-amylase inhibition reached 30.11%. Anticholinesterase activity was also weak, with maximum acetylcholinesterase (AChE) and butyrylcholinesterase (BChE) inhibition values of 15.27% and 19.93%, respectively. In contrast, antioxidant activity was more pronounced, with ABTS radical scavenging reaching 97.40%, comparable to the reference standard. Molecular docking supported these findings by indicating favorable binding interactions of major phenolic compounds with target enzymes.

Indexed as

AntioxidantsCholinesterase InhibitorsFabaceaePhenolsSeedsAcetylcholinesterasealpha-Amylasesalpha-GlucosidasesBenzothiazolesButyrylcholinesteraseGlycoside Hydrolase InhibitorsMolecular Docking SimulationPlant ExtractsStructure-Activity RelationshipSulfonic Acids2,2'-azino-di-(3-ethylbenzothiazoline)-6-sulfonic acidAcetylcholinesterasealpha-Amylasesalpha-GlucosidasesAntioxidantsBenzothiazolesButyrylcholinesteraseCholinesterase InhibitorsGlycoside Hydrolase InhibitorsPhenolsPlant ExtractsSulfonic Acidsenzyme inhibitionGonocytisus angulatusmolecular dockingphenolic profilingPodocytisus caramanicus

Identifiers

PMID42801755
PMCPMC13616476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.