ArticleAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2026
Multi-Layer Transcriptomic Comparison Across Human, Pig, and Mouse Informs Tissue- and Trait-Specific Animal Model Selection.
Article in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Animal models are fundamental to biomedical research, yet the relative suitability of pigs and mice remains unclear across tissues, regulatory layers, and phenotype domains. Here, we assembled a large-scale, tissue-matched transcriptomic resource comprising more than 16 000 RNA-seq samples from 15 corresponding human, pig, and mouse tissues, and established a unified framework integrating global co-expression conservation, co-expression network architecture, tissue-specific programs, 3D genome architecture, and human complex-trait genetics. Using 14 910 one-to-one orthologous genes, we found that human-pig pairs showed higher global co-expression similarity than human-mouse pairs in most tissues, with exceptions including skin, pancreas, and kidney. Integration with 176 human complex traits further revealed distinct phenotypic associations of species-preferred patterns: human-pig-preferred genes showed preferential associations with cardiometabolic, biochemical, and blood-related traits, whereas both-conserved genes showed stronger associations with neuropsychiatric, cognitive, and behavioral phenotypes. Together, our results demonstrate that cross-species similarity is hierarchical and context-dependent, varying across tissues, regulatory layers, and trait domains. Rather than supporting a universally optimal model organism, our study provides a comparative framework for prioritizing animal models based on regulatory conservation, together with an interactive portal for gene-centered exploration across humans, pigs, and mice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.