Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42801618›Full record

ArticleAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2026

Multi-Layer Transcriptomic Comparison Across Human, Pig, and Mouse Informs Tissue- and Trait-Specific Animal Model Selection.

Jingwen Dou, Yong Liao, Xiong Shen, Xin Huang, Zhenshuang Tang, Yuwei Gou, Huajun Zhou, Jingya Xu, Hong Liu, Yue Wang and 12 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Jingwen DouKey Laboratory of Agricultural Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Education, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-2458-2861
Yong LiaoKey Laboratory of Agricultural Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Education, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-3048-4955
Xiong ShenKey Laboratory of Agricultural Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Education, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-0113-4558
Xin HuangKey Laboratory of Agricultural Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Education, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Zhenshuang TangYazhouwan National Laboratory, Sanya, China.
Yuwei GouKey Laboratory of Agricultural Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Education, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Huajun ZhouKey Laboratory of Agricultural Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Education, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Jingya XuKey Laboratory of Agricultural Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Education, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Hong LiuKey Laboratory of Agricultural Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Education, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Yue WangKey Laboratory of Agricultural Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Education, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Keke LiangKey Laboratory of Agricultural Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Education, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Jia LiuKey Laboratory of Agricultural Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Education, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Xiao ZhangKey Laboratory of Agricultural Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Education, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-0206-8607
Chenyao LiKey Laboratory of Agricultural Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Education, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Shangjian WangKey Laboratory of Agricultural Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Education, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Liangliang FuKey Laboratory of Agricultural Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Education, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Lilin YinKey Laboratory of Agricultural Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Education, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Xinyun LiKey Laboratory of Agricultural Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Education, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Shuhong ZhaoKey Laboratory of Agricultural Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Education, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Xiaolei LiuKey Laboratory of Agricultural Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Education, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9954-1426
Jingjin LiKey Laboratory of Agricultural Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Education, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-4118-1333
Yuhua FuKey Laboratory of Agricultural Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Education, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7482-7834

Funding

China Agriculture Research System CARS-35Foundation for Innovative Research Groups of the National Natural Science Foundation of China 32221005Fundamental and Interdisciplinary Disciplines Breakthrough Plan of the Ministry of Education of China JYB2025XDXM704National Natural Science Foundation of China 32272841 32302704
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animal models are fundamental to biomedical research, yet the relative suitability of pigs and mice remains unclear across tissues, regulatory layers, and phenotype domains. Here, we assembled a large-scale, tissue-matched transcriptomic resource comprising more than 16 000 RNA-seq samples from 15 corresponding human, pig, and mouse tissues, and established a unified framework integrating global co-expression conservation, co-expression network architecture, tissue-specific programs, 3D genome architecture, and human complex-trait genetics. Using 14 910 one-to-one orthologous genes, we found that human-pig pairs showed higher global co-expression similarity than human-mouse pairs in most tissues, with exceptions including skin, pancreas, and kidney. Integration with 176 human complex traits further revealed distinct phenotypic associations of species-preferred patterns: human-pig-preferred genes showed preferential associations with cardiometabolic, biochemical, and blood-related traits, whereas both-conserved genes showed stronger associations with neuropsychiatric, cognitive, and behavioral phenotypes. Together, our results demonstrate that cross-species similarity is hierarchical and context-dependent, varying across tissues, regulatory layers, and trait domains. Rather than supporting a universally optimal model organism, our study provides a comparative framework for prioritizing animal models based on regulatory conservation, together with an interactive portal for gene-centered exploration across humans, pigs, and mice.

Indexed as

animal model selectioncross‐species transcriptomicsgene co‐expression conservationhuman complex traits

Identifiers

PMID42801618
PMCPMC13616397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.