ArticleJournal of community health2026
Streamlining Qualitative Research: Rapid Analysis Innovations in Expanding the Crisis Care Continuum Through Community-Based Implementation Science.
Article in Journal of community health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Qualitative research is a valuable tool for implementing community-based interventions. Rapid analysis (RA) is an applied qualitative approach benefiting community-engaged implementation research by quickly obtaining and analyzing data for actionable results, without sacrificing scientific rigor. To provide technical assistance to four Kentucky communities to strengthen behavioral health crisis response systems, an RA approach was informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Science (CFIR), guiding the development of interview instruments, codebook, data organization, and dissemination of findings to both the internal team and back to the community. The Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, and Sustainment (EPIS) Framework was used to determine research focus for each community. Initial conversations (n = 109) were conducted to build rapport, followed by interviews and focus groups in iterative first round (n = 165), second round (n = 40), and third round (n = 95) to understand the behavioral health landscape in their communities. Through RA strategies, researchers were able to identify community's CFIR-guided themes and EPIS stages, including barriers and facilitators, to provide practical solutions for effective implementation in their contexts. Community presentations and weekly internal reports contributed to technical assistance tailored to the implementation stage. Specific RA-driven impacts included co-developing 202 A involuntary process flowcharts, analyzing 911 call narratives to improve behavioral health dispatch, and facilitating two behavioral health coalitions formation. This study found that using rapid analysis can enhance systems capacity, implementation support, and identify sustainable best practices directly informed by the community. As such, RA serves as an important innovation for implementation science, qualitative research, and building trust with community.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42801434What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.