ReviewMolecular biology reports2026
Assessment and detection of nucleotide excision repair capability in human cells: a critical review of current functional methods.
Review in Molecular biology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
DNA, as the blueprint of the cell, is continuously subjected to damage by chemicals and radiation. Such damage can lead to cell death or mutations, potentially resulting in diseases such as cancer. Fortunately, cells possess various mechanisms to repair different types of DNA damage. Nucleotide excision repair (NER) removes damaged DNA fragments and restores the original DNA sequence, thereby limiting mutagenesis and supporting genome stability. Although NER contributes to cancer prevention, its activity can be altered in a context-dependent manner in cancer cells, with increased NER capacity in some cancers potentially promoting resistance to DNA-damaging therapies. This review summarizes and compares biochemical, cellular, and genome-wide approaches for functional NER analysis, with particular attention to their measured endpoints, methodological characteristics, and interpretive limitations. The assays cover excision-product formation, repair-associated DNA synthesis, transcriptional or reporter gene-expression recovery, lesion removal inferred from restored DNA amplifiability, and genome-wide mapping of DNA damage and excision events. Because these methods interrogate distinct stages or consequences of NER, their selection and interpretation should be guided by the specific research question, with complementary readouts providing a more comprehensive assessment of NER function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42801347What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.