ArticlePediatric surgery international2026
Impact of prior pulmonary infection on surgical outcomes in pediatric pulmonary sequestration: a multicenter retrospective study from the East Asia Pediatric Surgery Research Consortium.
Article in Pediatric surgery international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aims to compare the clinical and surgical characteristics of intralobar (IPS) and extralobar (EPS) pulmonary sequestration, with focus on the impact of prior pulmonary infection on IPS.
methodsThis retrospective multicenter study included pediatric patients with pulmonary sequestration who underwent surgery between 2005 and 2024 at four institutions in Hong Kong and Japan. Patients with hybrid lesions were excluded. Multivariable logistic regression and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) were performed in the IPS subgroup.
resultsAmong 133 patients (73 IPS, 60 EPS), IPS had higher prior infection rates (27.4% vs. 3.3%, p < 0.01), required lobectomy more frequently (63.0% vs. 0%, p < 0.001), and showed longer operative time (182 vs. 75 min, p < 0.001) than EPS. After IPTW adjustment, prior infection remained associated with longer operative time (+ 92.9 min, p = 0.002) and a trend toward increased lobectomy (OR 6.85, p = 0.089). Early postoperative complications were comparable.
conclusionIPS showed greater operative complexity than EPS, primarily driven by prior infection and the need for lobectomy. Early elective resection before infection develops may reduce operative complexity while maintaining surgical safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42801346What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.