Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42801339›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of pediatrics2026

Combination therapy with furosemide and metolazone as compared to furosemide alone for treatment of edema in children with nephrotic syndrome: a randomized controlled trial.

Smruti Acharya, Joseph John, Amit Kumar Satapathy

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Smruti AcharyaDepartment of Pediatrics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, 751019, Odisha, India.
Joseph JohnDepartment of Pediatrics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, 751019, Odisha, India.
Amit Kumar SatapathyDepartment of Pediatrics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, 751019, Odisha, India. ped_amit@aiimsbhubaneswar.edu.in.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1101-7847

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nephrotic syndrome (NS) in children often presents with debilitating edema and optimal use of diuretics in presence of hypoalbuminemia is uncertain. Early initiation of a combination diuretic therapy can be efficacious in greater. The primary objective was to compare cumulative urine output over 48 h between children receiving furosemide plus metolazone and those receiving furosemide alone. Children aged 1-14 years with NS presenting with moderate to severe edema were enrolled and randomized into two groups, furosemide plus metolazone and furosemide-alone group. The urine volumes and weight were monitored twice daily for 48 h. Serum urea, creatinine, electrolytes, hematocrit, and hospital stay were recorded as secondary outcomes. Fifty children were randomized (25 per group) with comparable baseline characteristics and urine output. Mean urine output over 48 h was 3.13 (± 1.5) ml/kg/h in furosemide plus metolazone group and 2.96 (± 1.32) ml/kg/h in furosemide alone which did not significantly differ between the groups (p > 0.05). The change in urine output from baseline was significantly higher in combination group (2.15 ± 1.31 vs 1.44 ± 1.28 ml/kg/h; p = 0.03) in the unadjusted comparison, but it was not statistically significant after adjustment for baseline urine output by ANCOVA. Dyselectrolytemia, percentage of weight loss, and hospital stay were similar in both groups. Sixteen percent of children in the combination group had significant weight loss requiring discontinuation of therapy.

conclusionThere was no difference in urine output or weight loss with combination therapy. Given the neutral primary outcome and the need to discontinue therapy in a subset of patients, upfront combination therapy is not recommended based on these findings. However, it should be considered hypothesis-generating for further studies in selected group of children.

trial registrationCTRI/2023/05/052552 dated 12th May 2023. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Combination diuretic therapy has been used in children with refractory edema due to nephrotic syndrome. • Similar combination approaches are employed in other edematous conditions, often resulting in improved diuresis. WHAT IS NEW: • In this randomized controlled trial, combination therapy did not significantly improve urine output compared to controls. There was significantly greater increase in urine output from baseline in the unadjusted comparison. However, when adjusted for baseline urine output, it was no longer statistically significant. • The regimen was not free of adverse events even though no hemodynamically safety issues were observed under strict monitoring; however, findings do not support routine upfront use in unselected children with nephrotic syndrome.

Indexed as

DiureticsEdemaFurosemideMetolazoneNephrotic SyndromeAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHumansInfantMaleTreatment OutcomeDiureticsFurosemideMetolazoneEdemaFurosemideMetolazoneNephrotic syndromeSequential blocking

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.