ArticleCureus2026
Upper-Limb Compartment Syndrome Following Rapid Infusion Catheter Extravasation During Orthotopic Liver Transplantation: A Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rapid infusion catheters (RICs) provide high-flow peripheral venous access for major haemorrhage but can cause severe tissue injury if pressurised infusion becomes extravascular. We report upper-limb acute compartment syndrome during orthotopic liver transplantation following transfusion through an 8.5 Fr Arrow RIC (Teleflex Incorporated, Morrisville, NC, USA). A female in her late 60s with decompensated cryptogenic cirrhosis underwent urgent transplantation. Four hours before surgery, an attempt to place an 8.5 Fr RIC in the left antecubital fossa was abandoned because of guidewire resistance. Immediately before incision, a second 8.5 Fr RIC was inserted at the same site under real-time ultrasound guidance; intraluminal position was confirmed and a 20 mL saline flush produced no resistance or swelling. Approximately 4.5 L of blood products and resuscitation fluid were subsequently delivered through the circuit over two hours, although the proportion that extravasated could not be determined. During the dissection phase, potassium increased to 6.1 mmol/L and lactate to 5.2 mmol/L. Examination beneath the drapes revealed a cool, dusky hand with an absent radial pulse, a tense anterior compartment of the upper arm, and ecchymosis, epidermolysis, and haemorrhagic bullae extending from the antecubital fossa into the proximal forearm. Infusion was stopped immediately, and surgical decompression of the anterior compartment of the upper arm was performed in parallel with the transplant. The radial pulse returned immediately after fascial release, and full motor and sensory function was present at discharge and at six-week follow-up. This case demonstrates that successful ultrasound confirmation and an unremarkable test flush at insertion do not ensure continued intravascular function during positioning, draping, and pressurised infusion. Persistent or unexplained guidewire resistance warrants reassessment, and a potentially traumatised vein should not be reused for high-pressure infusion when safer alternative access is available. High-flow peripheral access sites should remain visible whenever feasible or undergo a defined programme of reinspection throughout use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.