Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42801150›Full record

ArticleProstate international2026

Factors predicting the success of ejaculation preserving transurethral resection of the prostate: a prospective cohort study.

Ahmed Higazy, Marco Sawiris, Mohamed Kotb, Mohamed Ismail, Ahmed Tawfick, Ahmed Lotfy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Prostate international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ahmed HigazyAin Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
Marco SawirisAin Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
Mohamed KotbAin Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
Mohamed IsmailAin Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
Ahmed TawfickAin Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
Ahmed LotfyAin Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical and anatomical factors predicting the preservation of antegrade ejaculation following ejaculation-preserving transurethral resection of the prostate (EP-TURP). Materials and methods: This prospective cohort study included sexually active men undergoing EP-TURP. Preoperative evaluation included the International Prostate Symptom Score, quality of life, and assessment of ejaculatory function using the Male Sexual Health Questionnaire-Ejaculatory Dysfunction Short Form. Transrectal ultrasonography was used to evaluate prostate size, intravesical prostatic protrusion, supramontanal length, and the presence of a median lobe. The surgical technique involved preserving 1 cm of circumferential urethral mucosa around the verumontanum while performing standard bipolar TURP. Patients were followed up at 3 months postoperatively. Multivariable regression analysis was used to identify predictors of ejaculation preservation. Results: A total of 108 patients were included in the final analysis. Significant improvements were observed in postoperative voiding parameters ( Conclusions: EP-TURP provides significant improvement in voiding parameters while preserving antegrade ejaculation in a substantial proportion of patients. Larger prostate size, significant intravesical prostatic protrusion, and median lobe enlargement are associated with lower preservation rates and should be considered during patient selection and preoperative counseling.

Indexed as

Benign prostatic hyperplasiaEjaculation preservationProstateRetrograde ejaculationSexual dysfunctionTransurethral resection of the prostate

Identifiers

PMID42801150
PMCPMC13615703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.