ArticleCureus2026
Predicting Skin-to-Bone Depth During Bone Marrow Biopsy: The Role of BMI, Waist Circumference, and Sex.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Bone marrow biopsy is an essential diagnostic procedure in haematology. Increasing rates of obesity may create technical challenges during biopsy by obscuring anatomical landmarks and increasing the distance between the skin surface and the posterior superior iliac spine (PSIS). Identifying patients who may be unsuitable for a standard non-image-guided approach could improve procedural planning, safety, and efficiency. Methodology Data from 50 consecutive patients undergoing bone marrow biopsy were collected as part of routine clinical care and a service evaluation. A retrospective analysis of these data was subsequently performed, with 46 patients included in the final analysis. Body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, and sex were recorded for each patient. Skin-to-bone depth at the PSIS was measured intra-procedurally. Associations were analysed using correlation analysis, simple linear regression, and multiple linear regression. Internal validation of the final regression model was performed using 1,000 bootstrap resamples to assess model stability and estimate optimism. Results Waist circumference and BMI were both significantly positively associated with skin-to-bone depth (p < 0.001 for both variables), with waist circumference demonstrating a stronger association (r = 0.617, R² = 0.381) than BMI (r = 0.489, R² = 0.239). Female patients demonstrated a greater mean skin-to-bone depth than males (4.74 cm vs 2.33 cm). A multiple linear regression model incorporating waist circumference and sex explained 61.1% of the variance in skin-to-bone depth (R² = 0.611). Internal validation using 1,000 bootstrap resamples demonstrated relatively stable model performance, with an optimism-corrected R² of 0.569. Although a waist circumference-by-sex interaction term was explored, it was not statistically significant. Conclusions Although waist circumference and sex were significant predictors of skin-to-bone depth, the predictive accuracy of anthropometric measurements alone was insufficient for reliable clinical decision-making. Substantial unexplained variability remained despite improved predictive performance in the combined regression model. Anthropometric measurements alone were therefore insufficient to reliably identify patients unsuitable for a standard non-image-guided biopsy. Clinical assessment remains essential when planning bone marrow biopsy procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.