ArticlePlant diversity2026
High invader density alone drives invasive plant dominance, but its impacts on native community biomass and diversity depend on nutrients and microplastics.
Article in Plant diversity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Freshwater ecosystems are increasingly exposed to multiple global change drivers such as nutrient enrichment and emerging pollutants, which significantly influence biological invasions. Although high invader density is known to enhance invasion success, its consequences for native community biomass and diversity under interacting stressors remain insufficiently explored. We conducted a factorial mesocosm experiment using four invasive aquatic macrophytes and five native plant communities to assess the individual and interactive effects of invader density (one vs. two individuals), nutrient enrichment (enriched vs. unenriched), and microplastic pollution (presence vs. absence) on invasion success and native community biomass and diversity. High invader density substantially increased both the absolute and relative biomass of invasive plants (by 75.9% and 32.1%, respectively), and this effect was consistent across nutrient and microplastic treatments. In contrast, native community responses were highly context-dependent. Under nutrient enrichment without microplastics, high invader density enhanced both native biomass and diversity, whereas under low nutrient conditions it reduced native biomass without affecting diversity. When nutrient enrichment and microplastics co-occurred, high invader density decreased native diversity while leaving biomass unchanged; under low nutrient conditions with microplastics, it increased diversity but had no effect on biomass. These findings demonstrate that modest increases in initial invader density can strongly influence invasion success, whereas consequences for native communities depend on the interplay of multiple biotic and abiotic factors, underscoring the multi-factorial nature of plant invasions in changing environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.