Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42801112›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Chairside Tomosynthesis for Intraoperative Imaging in Implant Dentistry: Clinical Applications and Workflow Considerations.

David Hansen, Gregori M Kurtzman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

David HansenDentistry, Woodland Dental, Salem, USA.
Gregori M KurtzmanGeneral Dentistry and Implantology, Private Practice, Silver Spring, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) has become an important component of implant dentistry by providing three-dimensional visualization for diagnosis and treatment planning. However, once implant surgery begins, obtaining additional three-dimensional imaging may require interruption of the procedure and transportation of the patient to a dedicated imaging system. Chairside tomosynthesis offers an alternative approach by providing focused sectional imaging directly within the operatory. This article describes the principles, clinical applications, and workflow considerations of chairside tomosynthesis in implant dentistry, with emphasis on its potential role in addressing focused intraoperative imaging questions and supporting real-time clinical decision-making. Unlike CBCT, which provides comprehensive three-dimensional information for diagnosis and treatment planning, tomosynthesis acquires multiple radiographic projections over a limited arc and reconstructs them into sectional images of a focused region of interest. Potential applications during implant surgery include verification of osteotomy trajectory and implant position, assessment of posterior mandibular implants relative to the inferior alveolar canal, evaluation of anterior maxillary implant positioning and cortical plates, immediate implant placement, sinus augmentation, full-arch rehabilitation, revision procedures, and retrieval of retained or fractured implant components. The mobile Lumos 3DX (Valkyrie Bioscience, Lindon) system permits this focused imaging to be performed chairside, potentially reducing disruption of the surgical workflow and providing additional information when a specific clinical question arises. Chairside tomosynthesis should be considered complementary to, rather than a replacement for, CBCT. CBCT remains the preferred modality for comprehensive diagnosis and preoperative treatment planning, whereas chairside tomosynthesis may provide focused sectional information when additional visualization is required during implant surgery. By providing three-dimensional imaging directly within the operatory, chairside tomosynthesis may help bridge the intraoperative imaging gap and the need for timely sectional imaging during surgery without interrupting the procedure to transport the patient to a dedicated CBCT system, while preserving procedural continuity. Further clinical investigation is necessary to define appropriate indications and determine its diagnostic accuracy, clinical utility, and effect on treatment outcomes.

Indexed as

chairside tomosynthesiscone beam computed tomographyimplant dentistryintraoperative imagingthree-dimensional imaging

Identifiers

PMID42801112
PMCPMC13615643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.