ArticleISME communications2026
Microbial community coalescence restructures co-occurrence architecture and generates regime-specific patterns of network complexity and stability.
Article in ISME communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microbial community coalescence (MCC), the mixing of distinct microbiomes, is increasingly recognized as an important process in natural and managed microbial systems. However, how MCC reorganizes species association architecture and whether this restructuring alters community stability remain poorly understood. Here, we investigated how MCC modifies microbial co-occurrence networks and whether resulting architectures deviate from expectations based on stochastic reshuffling or direct compositional mixing of donor communities. Using controlled soil microcosms, we manipulated pairwise coalescence scenarios across a gradient of biotic dilution and tracked community reassembly over 30 days. Empirical association networks were then compared to two reference frameworks: a stochastic balanced-averaging null model and a donor-preserving compositional mixing model. Across treatments, MCC produced extensive restructuring of species association architecture, with empirical networks exhibiting substantially higher node turnover and a predominance of novel correlations relative to both reference expectations. Higher-order network properties also frequently diverged from expected simulated outcomes, indicating that coalescence reshapes correlation architecture beyond stochastic or additive donor mixing. The consequences of this restructuring for network stability were strongly context-dependent. In one coalescence regime, reductions in biotic complexity led to coordinated declines in network complexity and robustness, accompanied by increased fragmentation and vulnerability, whereas other regimes remained insensitive to the biotic dilution gradient. Moreover, community diversity predicted network architecture only under specific coalescence contexts, revealing regime-specific relationships between community diversity, network complexity, and network stability. Together, these results demonstrate that MCC reorganizes microbial association networks in patterns consistent with context-dependent ecological processes that generate distinct complexity and stability patterns.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.