ArticleBiomedical engineering letters2026
Development of a neural network predicting signals for time-domain diffuse optical tomography.
Article in Biomedical engineering letters, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Time-domain diffuse optical tomography (TD-DOT) is a powerful method for diagnosing anomalies in biological tissue such as brain hemorrhage and tumor. However, numerical simulations for TD-DOT require exploring a large number of parameter combinations and demand substantial computational resources. To address this challenge, we develop a neural network (NN) that can rapidly infer time-resolved signals from given tissue parameters. A high-quality training dataset for the NN is generated using ray-tracing-based radiative transfer simulations for 640 different absorber parameter combinations. Using the simulation data, we utilize NN to construct an emulator reproducing time-resolved signals for any parameters not used in the training data. We train two NN models with different training datasets: one with Gaussian noise added and the other without Gaussian noise. The NN trained with noisy data demonstrates superior performance, accurately reproducing time-resolved signals for unseen parameters. Its errors remain comparable to the noise level in the training data, highlighting strong robustness and generalization capability. Each inference takes only [Formula: see text] seconds, which is [Formula: see text] times faster than a direct radiative transfer simulation. This drastic speedup suggests the potential for efficient inverse problem analysis and application in real-time clinical diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.