SynthesisF1000Research2026
Conceptual Understanding and Conceptual Change Through Human AI Collaboration in Science Education: An Integrated Conceptual Framework from a Systematic Literature Review.
Synthesis in F1000Research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Human Artificial Intelligence (Human AI) Collaboration in science education is gaining momentum and more research is required on how it can facilitate students' conceptual understanding and conceptual change. Currently, most studies on AI in science education investigate the use of one particular tool and its effects on learning. However, it is the learning mechanisms that are triggered by these tools that help develop knowledge. This systematic literature review was conducted by performing a systematic search within the Scopus database which was last updated on 15 June 2026. In line with the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, a total of 28 empirical studies research were analyzed. These studies of empirical research were published between 2023 and 2026. Six roles of AI supporting the students' conceptual understanding as well as five mechanisms supporting the students' conceptual change were identified. Five interconnected learning mechanisms were derived from the analyzed studies, which are presented in an integrated conceptual framework. The framework is based on the theoretical framework of constructivism, the views on learning of the sociocultural theory, the approach of inquiry based science learning as well as on the metacognitive theory. Within the framework AI functions as a learning partner. The framework illustrates how, within science learning environments that are supported by AI, students continuously construct, evaluate and refine their scientific knowledge in order to achieve deeper understanding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.