ReviewLaryngoscope investigative otolaryngology2026
The Economics of Intraoperative Parathyroid Hormone Monitoring for Parathyroid Surgery: A Scoping Review of Cost Analyses and Economic Evaluations.
Review in Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Intraoperative PTH (IOPTH) monitoring is recommended for primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT), but questions surround its added clinical value and financial cost. We evaluated the methodological quality of economic evaluations investigating IOPTH monitoring in surgery for PHPT. Methods: We searched several databases, including MEDLINE and EMBASE, from January 1990 to June 2026. All screening was performed in duplicate. We included studies that conducted economic evaluations of IOPTH monitoring. Risk of bias (ROB) and methodological quality were evaluated in duplicate using ECOBIAS and CHEERS for full economic evaluations, while other criteria were applied to all eligible studies. We conducted a narrative synthesis with descriptive analysis. Results: Of the 668 articles reviewed, 22 articles met eligibility criteria. Most studies were observational (77%) and 14% were derived from decision tree models; 82% were partial economic evaluations and 18% were full economic evaluations. CHEERS adherence for full economic evaluation ranged from 46%-81%, and there was moderate/high ROB secondary to issues with reporting the time horizon, cost discounting, sensitivity analyses, and equity consideration biases. Economic perspective (14%), cost discounting (14%), economic summary measures (9%), and sensitivity analyses (23%) were infrequently reported. 50% of studies commented on IOPTH monitoring cost-effectiveness despite not investigating incremental economic summary measures. There was a similar number of studies reporting cost reductions and cost increases from the use of IOPTH monitoring. Conclusions: Knowledge gaps and methodological inadequacies impede our current understanding of the economics of IOPTH monitoring. The shortcomings identified should be addressed in future economic evaluations of intraoperative parathyroid technologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.