ArticleCureus2026
Delays in Initiating Ambulance Transport Following Emergency Patient Referral to Mulago National Referral Hospital.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Timely ambulance transport is critical for emergency care, yet delays in initiating transport for transfers are common in low- and middle-income countries. In Uganda, given the limited ambulance fleet, we conducted a secondary analysis of data from a cross-sectional study that was conducted to assess compliance with national ambulance operational standards across key emergency medical services domains. The objective of this secondary analysis was to determine the factors associated with delays of more than 60 minutes in initiating ambulance transport from the decision to refer to Mulago National Referral Hospital. Methods This was a non-pre-specified secondary analysis of data from a cross-sectional study assessing ambulance operational performance in Uganda between May and August 2024. Variables in the primary dataset were reviewed for relevance to the specific outcome of delayed initiation of ambulance transport and were included in the analysis. The primary outcome was time to transport initiation following referral decision, categorized by a 60-minute threshold (≤60 vs >60 minutes), as per Uganda's national EMS strategic plan for ambulance operations. Multivariable binary logistic regression analysis identified factors associated with delayed initiation. Results Among 118 emergency interfacility referrals, 71 (60.2%) were initiated after 60 minutes. Delayed initiation was observed more frequently when ambulances were occupied at the time of interfacility referral (AOR 5.5; p <0.008), fuel was inadequate (AOR 3.1; p 0.008), staffing was hospital-based rather than by dedicated emergency medical technicians (EMTs) (AOR 2.5; p 0.015), and when the availability of essential medical products was below 75% (AOR 2.4; p 0.032). Conclusions Most emergency interfacility referrals experienced delays in initiating ambulance transport. Delays were commonly observed in settings where ambulances were occupied, fuel was inadequate, staffing relied on hospital-based personnel, or medical products were limited. These findings identify operational factors associated with delayed ambulance transport initiation, highlight potential benchmarks for improving timeliness, and warrant further evaluation to refine time benchmarks for interfacility emergency transport.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.