ArticleChild and adolescent psychiatry and mental health2026
Effectiveness of a family-oriented intervention for children of mentally ill parents on children's mental health and health-related quality of life: a prospective, rater-blinded, cluster-randomized controlled multicenter trial.
Article in Child and adolescent psychiatry and mental health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChildren of mentally ill parents (CHIMPS) experience a variety of negative outcomes and have an increased risk for mental illness. Nevertheless, no routine screenings or therapies for CHIMPS exist in the German healthcare system. The CHIMPS program was developed as a psychodynamic, transdiagnostic family intervention for affected children and adolescents (CA). Its effectiveness on mental health and health-related quality of life was evaluated in a prospective, two-arm, cluster-randomized, controlled, open, multicentric trial.
methodsData from families with mentally ill parents were collected at seven sites in Germany and Switzerland at four measurement points. Group allocation was randomized. The intervention group (IG) received the CHIMPS intervention, while the control group (CG) received Treatment-As-Usual. The primary outcome was the mental health of CA with an initial psychiatric diagnosis according to the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School Aged Children, Lifetime Version (applied by blinded external raters) 18 months after baseline. Secondary outcomes comprised mental health assessed with the parent-rated Child Behavior Checklist and the self-rated Youth Self Report, and health-related quality of life assessed with the KIDSCREEN-27 (parent- and self-rated). Multilevel models were used for analysis.
resultsTwo hundred fifteen families (109 in IG, 106 in CG) were included in the trial. Data from 43 CA in both the IG and CG were used in the primary analysis. An odds ratio of 0.52 (95% CI: 0.25; 1.09) indicated a statistically not significant advantage of the IG over the CG. No clinically relevant advantage of the IG in any secondary outcome was found.
conclusionsThe CHIMPS program will be revised to provide families with more needs-based assistance. A diagnostic evaluation, which was delivered to both IG and CG families, may have had a therapeutic effect. Future trials should place particular emphasis on improving accessibility and adherence among CHIMPS and their families, as the target group proved difficult to reach and retain. Above all, interdisciplinary structures that enable CHIMPS and their families to receive low-threshold care must be created. CLINICALTRIALS: gov NCT0230846 (December 4, 2014). German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00006806 (October 7, 2014).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.