SynthesisBMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation2026
Effects of combined balance and plyometric training on athletic performance: a systematic review.
Synthesis in BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPlyometric training is an effective method for improving explosive power, while balance training plays a pivotal role in enhancing agility and dynamic stability. Recently, combined balance and plyometric training (hereafter referred to as combined training) has gained increasing attention. This approach integrates plyometric exercises with separate balance training components. However, whether combined training offers superior benefits over single-mode training remains unclear.
objectiveThis systematic review aimed to evaluate the effects of combined training on athletic performance across different sports, assessing balance, agility, speed, and power. The review specifically examined interventions that included separate balance and plyometric components, and excluded plyometric training performed on unstable surfaces without a standalone balance component.
methodsFollowing PRISMA guidelines, a systematic search of Web of Science, PubMed, EBSCOhost, and Embase was performed from inception to March 15, 2026. Randomized controlled trials examining combined plyometric and balance training in athletes were included. Duplicates were removed via EndNote. Two independent reviewers screened records in two stages (title/abstract, then full text) and extracted data. Methodological quality was assessed using the PEDro scale. Disagreements were resolved by consultation with a third reviewer. The review followed the PROSPERO-registered protocol (CRD420251273522), with no deviations.
resultsFourteen studies involving 522 athletes were included, covering badminton, basketball, handball, soccer, dance, and taekwondo. Participants were predominantly adolescents aged 11-24 years. Intervention duration ranged from 6 to 12 weeks, with a frequency of 2-3 sessions per week and session lengths of 5-60 min. The available evidence suggests that combined training may enhance balance and agility. However, findings on speed and explosive power improvements remain inconsistent.
conclusionsCombined training may offer benefits, particularly for balance and agility (moderate-certainty evidence). These findings provide preliminary practical implications for coaches and may inform training program design. However, evidence for speed and explosive power is of low certainty, and further high-quality research is needed to verify these effects.
trial registrationIdentifier CRD420251273522.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.