ArticleBMC chemistry2026
Holistically benchmarked optimization-assisted green spectrophotometric-chemometric approach for simultaneous determination of piroxicam and venlafaxine in pharmaceutical formulations and spiked human plasma.
Article in BMC chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The recent clinical introduction of the piroxicam (PIR) and venlafaxine hydrochloride (VEN) combination has highlighted the need for analytical methodologies capable of simultaneously quantifying both drugs while minimizing the environmental burden of routine pharmaceutical analysis. To date, only a chromatographic method has been reported for this purpose, which is associated with relatively high organic solvent consumption, greater instrumental complexity, and increased energy requirements. A green UV spectrophotometric platform integrated with chemometric modeling was therefore established for the concurrent determination of PIR and VEN in pharmaceutical formulations and as a proof-of-concept application to spiked human plasma. Spectral measurements were performed using a water-ethanol (1:1, v/v) solvent system, whereas methanol was employed solely for plasma protein precipitation. Experimental design efficiency was enhanced by combining Brereton's multilevel calibration design with a Maximin Distance Design (MMD) for validation sample selection, enabling representative calibration and validation datasets to be generated with a reduced number of experimental mixtures. Severe spectral overlap between the two analytes was effectively resolved using six well-established chemometric approaches: CLS, PCR, PLS, GA-PLS, FA-PLS, and MCR-ALS. Among the investigated models, MCR-ALS showed the best overall numerical performance, achieving correlation coefficients of up to 0.9998 for pharmaceutical formulations and 0.9996 for spiked human plasma. The corresponding limits of detection were 0.125 and 0.029 µg mL⁻¹ for VEN and PIR, respectively, in pharmaceutical formulations, and 0.245 and 0.058 µg mL⁻¹ in spiked human plasma. Across the investigated concentration ranges, the proposed method also exhibited satisfactory accuracy and precision. The sustainability performance of the analytical platform was evaluated using multiple complementary metrics, with the pharmaceutical assay compared with the previously reported chromatographic procedure according to the evaluated criteria. The proposed pharmaceutical spectrophotometric assay showed a more favorable sustainability profile according to the evaluated criteria, including environmental and practical applicability dimensions. The application to spiked human plasma provided a proof-of-concept assessment of matrix applicability. Nevertheless, additional investigations involving incurred clinical specimens and full bioanalytical validation are required before the methodology can be considered suitable for routine clinical practice or pharmacokinetic studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.