ArticleJournal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics2026
Prior-informed population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling of dexamethasone in horses.
Article in Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Dexamethasone (DEX) is widely used in equine practice with diverse studies having characterized its pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) including our published comprehensive meta-analysis. Individual DEX concentrations in plasma and urine and serum cortisol from five studies (n = 32 horses) were analyzed using a minimal physiologically-based PK (mPBPK) model and a circadian baseline-indirect response PD model. The previous meta-analysis provided complex structural models to assess sources of variability across an array of studies involving intravenous (IV), intramuscular (IM) and intra-articular (IA) dosing of various formulations. Here we compare three population estimation approaches: first-order conditional estimation with interaction (FOCEI), FOCEI with informative priors (FOCEI-Priors), and full Bayesian estimation. The primary covariate found was hepatic clearance of DEX being 17% higher in adult female horses (0.59 L/h/kg) than in geldings (0.49 L/h/kg). Between-subject variability was identified for some parameters. Standard FOCEI required extensive fixing of parameters to achieve convergence. FOCEI-Priors exhibited robust estimation performance, resulting in well-captured DEX PK and cortisol profiles, precise parameter estimates, and satisfactory model diagnostics. Bayesian estimation failed in the posterior exploration for cortisol PD, likely due to its greater sensitivity to prior specification and data variability. This work demonstrated effective population extensions of complex, prior-informed, mechanistic mPBPK/PD models to confirm determinants and assess variability of DEX disposition and adrenal effects in horses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.