ArticleScientific data2026
Nationwide annual agricultural land-use maps of Germany from 1990 to 2023 derived from satellite imagery.
Article in Scientific data, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Nationwide annual agricultural land-use maps of Germany from 1990 to 2023 derived from satellite imagery.Scientific data · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We present German-wide annual agricultural land-use maps from 1990 to 2023, created from Landsat and Sentinel-2 images using a deep learning approach. Based on farmers' declarations from 2006 to 2022, we extracted annual training samples for 13 crop classes and one grassland class. These samples were used to train a multi-year one-dimensional convolutional neural network, which was subsequently applied to generate the annual land-use maps. Between 2010 and 2022, overall map accuracies ranged between 85% and 93%. When averaged over time, dominant classes like grassland, rapeseed, winter cereals, sugar beet, and maize were detected with high accuracy (≥90%). Conversely, minor classes such as fallow land and plantation were predicted with low accuracy (≤52%). Comparison of map areas with agricultural statistics over time revealed high correlations for most classes, particularly maize (r = 0.978). The presented maps provide an essential basis for analyzing long-term trends in agricultural land-use. They can be used to fill temporal gaps in national agricultural statistics and to disaggregate those statistics to higher spatial units.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.