ArticleBMJ paediatrics open2026
Structural and interagency influences on mandated health assessments for children in out-of-home care in Sweden: a qualitative study of child protection services workers.
Article in BMJ paediatrics open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChildren in out-of-home care (OOHC) have significantly poorer physical, mental and dental health than their peers. In Sweden, child protection services (CPS) are required to initiate health assessments (HAs) when a child is placed in OOHC. Despite this statutory requirement, fewer than half of eligible children undergo an HA. Factors influencing implementation remain poorly understood.
methodsThis qualitative study explored CPS caseworkers'change experiences of initiating and coordinating HAs for children placed in OOHC in Sweden. Five semi-structured focus group discussions were conducted with 18 CPS caseworkers. Participants were recruited nationwide through purposive snowball sampling. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis, applying a decision-making ecology framework to interpret individual, organisational and interagency influences.
resultsFour interrelated themes captured factors influencing implementation across the HA pathway: (1) Ideally, we do it for the child (initiation); (2) Negotiation and uncertainty (scheduling); (3) What we request is not always what we receive (conduct); and (4) Variable reporting and the challenge of closing the loop (reporting and follow-up). Across all phases, CPS caseworkers assumed a de facto coordinating role to compensate for fragmented interagency structures.
conclusionsFrom the perspective of CPS caseworkers, organisational and interagency factors influenced HAs across the assessment pathway. Fragmented routines and unclear responsibilities may reduce their usefulness for care planning and follow-up. Strengthening shared ownership and improving assessment, reporting and follow-up processes may support implementation. HAs may be most useful as part of a broader pathway of assessment, referral, care planning and follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.