ArticleBrazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology2026
Comparison of electrode montages for ocular Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potential (oVEMP) using air-conducted tone burst stimulation: Is there an optimal configuration?
Article in Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo compare three electrode montages - infraorbital (standard), chin and belly-tendon - for ocular Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potential (oVEMP), using air-conducted 500 Hz tone burst stimulation in health adults.
methodsAn observational cross-sectional study was conducted in 50 healthy volunteers (100 ears) aged 22‒55. oVEMP was recorded using three randomized electrode montages in all volunteers. N1 and P1 latencies, peak-to-peak amplitudes and asymmetry ratios were analyzed.
resultsBelly-tendon montage was associated with shorter N1 and P1 latencies compared to both infraorbital and chin montages (p < 0.05) and no significant differences in peak-to-peak amplitudes or asymmetry ratios were observed. No ear side or sex differences were found, while a significant negative correlation between age and interamplitude was noted.
conclusionsWhile the belly-tendon montage demonstrated shorter N1 and P1 latencies, all three configurations provided comparable amplitude and asymmetry ratio values. These finds suggest that electrode montage choice may prioritize patient comfort, examiner experience and anatomical characteristics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.