ArticleEBioMedicine2026
Proteomic signatures during pregnancy: an exploratory cohort study of long-term health indicators.
Article in EBioMedicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPregnancies complicated by fetal growth restriction (FGR) and preeclampsia are associated with increased long-term chronic disease risk. A blood test could possibly identify those at risk, opening the door to early interventions soon after delivery. Prior work in non-pregnant people have identified protein signatures associated with 18 different health parameters, called SomaSignal Tests.
methodsThis study applied SomaSignal tests to plasma samples collected in pregnancy from two independent cohorts to assess the 18 health parameters in those who later developed FGR and preeclampsia. SomaScan Assay measured ∼7000 modified aptamers in plasma from two independent cohorts. Plasma samples (Melbourne, Australia) were collected at 36 weeks' gestation from women who later delivered an FGR infant (<3rd birthweight centile, n = 118), preeclampsia at term (n = 92) or did not develop either condition (n = 177). The second cohort (Cambridge, UK) were plasma samples collected at 36 weeks' gestation from women who later delivered an FGR infant (n = 80), and those who did not (n = 172).
findingsIn the Australian cohort, women who later delivered growth-restricted infants had composite protein signatures associated with reduced cardiac function (p = 0.001), increased cardiovascular events (p = 7.6 × 10
interpretationSince signatures were more pronounced in pregnancies that were later diagnosed with FGR and preeclampsia, underlying physiological changes may have been present before diagnosis. These changes result in protein signatures concordant with those associated with poor long-term health outcomes in non-pregnant populations. These associations require validation in large, longitudinal cohorts investigating pregnancy, with long-term maternal follow-up.
fundingStillbirth CRE, Mercy Hospital Foundation and National Health and Medical Research Council, Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, Taylor Hammond Scholarship, National Health and Medical Research Council Fellowships and Australian Research Council Future Fellowships.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.