ReviewTransplant infectious disease : an official journal of the Transplantation Society2026
Cytomegalovirus Vaccines in Transplantation: History, Hurdles, and Hope.
Review in Transplant infectious disease : an official journal of the Transplantation Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) remains one of the most common and consequential pathogens in solid organ transplant (SOT) and allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) despite current prevention strategies. Even a partially effective CMV vaccine could reduce morbidity and mortality associated with CMV in SOT recipients (SOTr) and HCT recipients (HCTr), as well as decrease costs, toxicities, and the risk of antiviral resistance. Despite progress since the first CMV vaccine (Towne) was developed in the 1970s, no CMV vaccine has achieved regulatory approval. Differences in CMV epidemiology, host risk factors, and immune reconstitution between SOTr and HCTr, and heterogeneity in CMV vaccination goals across transplant populations, complicate the development of CMV vaccine candidates in transplantation. Incompletely defined immune correlates of protection and logistical barriers inherent to CMV vaccine clinical trial execution, such as unpredictable timing of transplantation and variable access to central laboratory monitoring, create additional challenges. This review describes the potential benefits of a CMV vaccine in HCTr and SOTr, summarizes prior trials of CMV vaccines in transplantation and the lessons learned, and provides a framework for overcoming historical barriers with innovative trial designs and validated biologic endpoints in the modern era of CMV prophylaxis to advance CMV vaccine candidates through clinical stages of development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.