ArticleCulture, medicine and psychiatry2026
Liberation Medicine in Authoritarian Contexts: The Brutality of U.S. Mass Incarceration.
Article in Culture, medicine and psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
This article engages Führer and Vorhölter's (2025) reinvigoration of Nancy Scheper-Hughes's utopian call for liberation medicine in their special issue of Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry. They offer a practical reconceptualization of liberation medicine as "concrete utopias" in the "medical undercommons". Inspired by Scheper-Hughes's humble call for "good-enough" ethnographic engagement in her documentation of a successful solidarity movement of single-mother agricultural laborers in Northeastern Brazil, I highlight ethnographically a (fragile) concrete utopian initiative: a peer-support program for inmates with psychosis spectrum conditions who are swept into the Los Angeles County Jail system's overcrowded mental health units on a daily basis by routinized law enforcement sweeps of homeless individuals. Developed by former gang members (without mental illness) facing capital punishment charges, this remarkable initiative of solidarity, redemption, and anti-racism through radical caregiving in a claustrophobic carceral environment is carving out a temporarily safe space free from abuse and violence. The larger facility remains gang-controlled and is overwhelmed by what colleagues and I have been calling "predatory accumulation" and "necrogovernance" processes (Hart et al., 2024, 2025). The inmates are powerless, caught within the "carceral mesh" of U.S. political-economic corporate and opportunistic special interests. Furthermore, the discretionary power of "hyperpunitive" U.S. judges allows them to routinely impose Life Without Parole (LWOP) sentences on redeemed inmates incarcerated as adolescents. Inspired by Scheper-Hughes's practical political optimism coupled with her love for ethnography and political activism, I end with eight practical suggestions for specific state bureaucratic reforms to foment public transparency about the useless cruelty of mass incarceration and the global rise of authoritarianisms in our perilous moment in global history.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.