ArticleJournal of applied genetics2026
Molecular heterogeneity and diagnostic performance of phenotype-driven multigene panel testing in patients with marfanoid habitus.
Article in Journal of applied genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Marfanoid habitus represents a clinically heterogeneous phenotype observed in Marfan syndrome (MFS) and other hereditary connective tissue disorders; however, the diagnostic utility of multigene panel testing in this group remains incompletely defined. Marfanoid features encountered in clinical genetics practice are often partial, age-dependent, or overlapping and may not meet diagnostic criteria for a single disorder, limiting phenotype-based classification and supporting multigene testing. We retrospectively evaluated the diagnostic yield of a custom-designed NGS panel targeting OMIM-listed syndromes associated with marfanoid habitus in 62 patients referred between 2016 and 2022. Clinical and molecular data were reviewed, and MFS systemic scores were compared between groups. Variants were identified in 28 of 51 patients analyzed by the panel, including four with FBN1 variants. Based on ACMG criteria and clinical evaluation, 16 cases were classified as clinically definitive, two as clinically high-probability, and ten as clinically suspicious diagnoses. The diagnostic yield was 54.9% overall and 31.3% for clinically definitive cases. Exome sequencing in panel-negative patients identified seven variants across six additional genes. No significant difference in systemic scores was observed between variant-positive and variant-negative cases; however, patients with FBN1 variants had significantly higher scores than those with variants in other genes. ROC analysis demonstrated good discriminatory performance for FBN1-related cases (AUC = 0.80; 95% CI, 0.63-0.94), and each one-point increase in systemic score was associated with a 1.51-fold increase in the odds of harboring an FBN1 variant. These findings support tailored multigene panel testing as an effective diagnostic strategy in patients with marfanoid habitus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42799944What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.