ArticleJournal of computer-aided molecular design2026
Rational design of anticancer metallodrugs.
Article in Journal of computer-aided molecular design, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite the undeniable clinical success of platinum-based antineoplastic agents, their rational design remains hindered by the inherent difficulties in capturing the quantum chemical electronic nature of their three-dimensional coordination geometries and variable oxidation states of transition metal complexes. To address this fundamental limitation, we introduce a machine learning framework based on density functional theory descriptors to discriminate between drug and non-drug metallocomplexes. A curated dataset of platinum complexes was subjected to conformational sampling and density functional theory geometry optimization. Unsupervised learning via principal component analysis and K-means clustering initially demonstrated that essential electronic parameters naturally segregate metallodrugs from non-drug metallocomplexes. Subsequently, a supervised Random Forest classifier reliably distinguished metallodrugs from structurally similar non-drug metallocomplexes. Crucially, global SHapley Additive exPlanations analysis revealed that local electron density properties, which strictly govern the established mechanisms of intracellular aquation and DNA binding, are the primary drivers of model predictions. The projection of an external test set of active ChEMBL platinum compounds successfully validated the established chemical space, demonstrating the model's ability to generalize to unseen data. This explainable predictive pipeline bridges a major gap in inorganic drug discovery, offering a robust, mechanistic tool for the rational generative design of next-generation metallodrugs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42799921What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.