ArticleBrain structure & function2026
Autoencoders for unsupervised analysis of rat myeloarchitecture.
Article in Brain structure & function, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Quantitative assessment of brain histology is often constrained by predefined feature sets and labor-intensive manual annotations. To overcome these limitations, we employed unsupervised deep learning to automatically extract and quantify tissue organizational patterns from myelin-stained rat brain sections without the need for prior labeling. We evaluated nonlinear convolutional autoencoders (AEs) against linear principal component analysis (PCA) and DINOv3, a self-supervised foundation model applied without task-specific fine-tuning, for feature representation, followed by clustering with Gaussian mixture models. Compared to both PCA and DINOv3, AEs better preserved fine axonal architecture and produced more consistent and interpretable tissue clusters across hierarchical levels. The resulting clusters revealed anatomically meaningful tissue organization, including different white matter densities and grey matter subregions. When applied to tissue from sham and mild traumatic brain injury animals, AE-derived features also captured pathology-related alterations, such as white matter loss and injury-specific microstructural changes. These findings suggest that task-specific unsupervised training on domain-specific histological data can automatically characterize tissue organization at multiple scales and detect pathological changes, offering a scalable, annotation-free approach to computational neuropathology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.