ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2027
Protocol for the Extraction of High-Quality DNA from Botrytis cinerea.
Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2027. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Using Botrytis cinerea (ATCC 58025) as the material, genomic DNA was extracted using the SDS-CTAB method after liquid nitrogen freezing and extracted multiple times with organic reagents. Then the precipitate was washed with ethanol and dissolved in TE buffer. The cultured genomic DNA is high-yield, easy to extract, and has good purity, making it suitable for extracting from multiple samples at once. After experiments, the genomic DNA obtained by this method can be used for most basic molecular biology experiments such as PCR and DNA enzyme digestion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42799844What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.