Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42799837›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2027

Botrytis cinerea Isolation Methods.

Crucitti Dalila, Pacifico Davide

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2027. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Crucitti DalilaInstitute of Biosciences and BioResources (IBBR), Italian National Research Council (CNR), Via Ugo la Malfa 153, 90146, Palermo, Italy. dalila.crucitti@cnr.it.
Pacifico DavideInstitute of Biosciences and BioResources (IBBR), Italian National Research Council (CNR), Via Ugo la Malfa 153, 90146, Palermo, Italy. davide.pacifico@cnr.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Efficient and reproducible isolation of Botrytis species, including Botrytis cinerea and Botrytis pseudocinerea, is essential for studies on fungal biology, epidemiology, and host-pathogen interactions. The protocols described in this chapter provide practical methods for obtaining pure cultures from symptomatic and asymptomatic plant tissues, as well as from single spores and hyphal fragments. Each approach is detailed with step-by-step instructions, highlighting critical parameters for successful isolation and culture maintenance. The symptomatic and asymptomatic tissue methods enable rapid recovery of isolates from field material, whereas the single-spore and hyphal-tip protocols ensure clonal purity and reduce contamination risks. Practical notes and troubleshooting tips are also provided to facilitate reproducibility across laboratories. These methods offer a comprehensive toolkit adaptable to different experimental needs, from basic mycological research to applied plant pathology, ensuring reliable access to genetically and phenotypically stable Botrytis isolates for downstream analyses.

Indexed as

BotrytisPlant DiseasesHyphaePlantsSpores, FungalBotrytis cinereaFungal isolationGray moldHyphal fragmentsSingle-spore culture

Identifiers

PMID42799837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.