Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42799785›Full record

ArticleBrain topography2026

"When the word ends, the story begins": word offsets improve encoding of natural speech in a MEG study.

Alena Ovakimian, Nikita Korotkov, Gurgen Soghoyan, Olga Sysoeva, Olga Martynova

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Brain topography, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alena OvakimianInstitute of Higher Nervous Activity and Neurophysiology of RAS, Moscow, Russia. a.s.ovakimian@ihna.ru.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1682-2485
Nikita KorotkovInstitute of Higher Nervous Activity and Neurophysiology of RAS, Moscow, Russia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-6438-5020
Gurgen SoghoyanInstitute of Higher Nervous Activity and Neurophysiology of RAS, Moscow, Russia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0034-0326
Olga SysoevaInstitute of Higher Nervous Activity and Neurophysiology of RAS, Moscow, Russia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4005-9512
Olga MartynovaInstitute of Higher Nervous Activity and Neurophysiology of RAS, Moscow, Russia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9047-2893

Funding

Russian Science Foundation 23-78-00011
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The segmentation of continuous speech into words was investigated using the temporal response function (TRF) approach for source-space magnetoencephalography (MEG) signals from 54 participants. Although the onset of words has been extensively studied, the contribution of their offset remains unclear. Acoustic and semantic predictors were used to test the relative contribution of word onsets and offsets to the processing of natural speech in the auditory temporal cortex. Circular shifting of word onsets and offsets significantly reduced predictive power (p < 0.001 for both). The corrupted word onset model showed a greater reduction in the predictive performance (p < 0.001). Both effects were localised to the left middle temporal gyrus (MTG) and the right banks of the superior temporal sulcus (STS). Additionally, removing the word offset predictor from the model significantly reduced predictive performance, indicating incremental word offset timing information beyond word onset and the remaining control predictors. These findings demonstrate the significant, albeit unequal, contribution of word onsets and offsets to the neural encoding of natural speech.

Indexed as

BrainMagnetoencephalographySpeechSpeech PerceptionAcoustic StimulationAdultAuditory CortexBrain MappingFemaleHumansMaleSemanticsTemporal LobeYoung AdultMEGNatural speechRussian languageTRFWord offsets

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.