Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42799696›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science2026

ASAS-NANP SYMPOSIUM: Mathematical modeling in animal nutrition-modeling in the agriculture 4.0 era and beyond: merging mechanistic knowledge and artificial intelligence with hybrid modeling.

Jennifer L Ellis, Jessica Bode, Maureen Sahar, Jihao You, Dan Tulpan, Noud Aldenhoven, Luis O Tedeschi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jennifer L EllisCentre for Nutrition Modelling, Department of Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0180-5084
Jessica BodeCentre for Nutrition Modelling, Department of Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada.
Maureen SaharCentre for Nutrition Modelling, Department of Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada.
Jihao YouCentre for Nutrition Modelling, Department of Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada.
Dan TulpanCentre for Nutrition Modelling, Department of Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1100-646X
Noud AldenhovenGlobal Nutrition, Formulation & Modelling, Nutreco, Amersfoort 3811 MH, The Netherlands.
Luis O TedeschiDepartment of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-2471, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1883-4911

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the arrival of the 4th Agricultural Revolution (Agriculture 4.0) and the influsion of animal production systems with sensors, automation, and advanced analytics, new opportunities have arisen to improve sustainability, efficiency, and the precision with which we feed animals. It is possible that the barriers of the past such as lack of automation, efficient means of data capture, and appropriate analytical tools with which to drive decision support and system optimization will be mitigated in our lifetime. Increasingly, we will see the blending of mechanistic understanding with technological advancement to guide decision-making. The emerging frontier of hybrid models representing frameworks that integrate mechanistic understanding with the pattern recognition of machine learning, offers considerable promise for application in animal systems. As an illustrative case study, research conducted in other fields where modeling approaches have been successfully integrated will be explored (for example, bioprocess engineering, weather, human health), as well as recent research in agriculture. Several architectures for hybrid modeling may be considered for application in animal biosciences: 1) Serial hybridization, where a machine learning (ML) model provides inputs into a white box model (could be mechanistic or empirical), or vice versa, 2) Parallel hybridization, where models act in parallel and ML and white box model outputs are aggregated or weighted to enhance model performance, 3) Physical constraint hybridization, where domain knowledge (such as conservation laws) typically embedded in mechanistic models are integrated into the structure, parameters or outputs of a ML model, and 4) mechanistic learning, where ML model(s) are embedded within a mechanistic model to predict specific pools or fluxes. Key challenges including data quality and integration, model interpretability, and computational efficiency are discussed alongside practical strategies to overcome them. This review examines how hybrid models can bridge the gap between data-driven insights and biological causality to support real-time decision-making in feed formulation, emissions management, and health monitoring. By positioning hybrid modeling as a cornerstone of precision livestock farming, Agriculture 4.0, and beyond, this review outlines a vision for next-generation tools that are scientifically grounded, causally robust, and prepared to support digital decision-making.

Indexed as

AgricultureAnimal HusbandryAnimal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaArtificial IntelligenceModels, BiologicalAnimalsMachine LearningSoft Computingagriculture 4.0hybrid modelingmachine learningmechanistic modelingprecision nutrition

Identifiers

PMID42799696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.