ArticleCureus2026
Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma of the Hard Palate: A Case Illustrating Grading Uncertainty and Bone-Sparing Surgical Management.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) of the hard palate presents diagnostic and surgical challenges, particularly regarding histological grading and preservation of the underlying palatal bone. Histological grading remains controversial because of multiple grading systems and inter-observer variability. A 42-year-old man presented with a painless 10-12 mm right paramedian hard-palate swelling that had been present for approximately 12 months, with slight enlargement over the preceding two months, identified incidentally during routine dental examination. Biopsy confirmed MEC. MRI and CT demonstrated a 15 × 12 × 5 mm lesion with cortical thinning but no cortical breach or definitive bone invasion. Following multidisciplinary team discussion, wide local excision with periosteal elevation and preservation of palatal bone was performed because of the small, well-circumscribed lesion, low-risk histological features, absence of radiological or intra-operative bone invasion, and importance of preserving palatal function. Final histology demonstrated low-grade features by AFIP criteria and intermediate-grade features by the Brandwein system, with no bone invasion. This case illustrates the challenges of grading discordance and integrating histopathological, radiological and intra-operative findings when considering bone-sparing surgery. In selected low-risk palatal MECs without evidence of osseous invasion, conservative surgery may provide good short-term functional outcomes. Multidisciplinary interpretation of grading, imaging and intra-operative findings may support bone-sparing management in carefully selected palatal MEC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.