Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42799521›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental orthopaedics2026

Multimodal evaluation of periosteal versus collagen membrane coverage in atelocollagen-associated autologous chondrocyte implantation for large knee cartilage defects.

Takuma Kaibara, Eiji Kondo, Yuki Ogawa, Masatake Matsuoka, Koji Iwasaki, Tomohiro Onodera, Yoshitaka Oda, Zen-Ichi Tanei, Daisuke Momma, Shinya Tanaka and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental orthopaedics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Takuma KaibaraDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine Sapporo Hokkaido Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7824-699X
Eiji KondoCentre for Sports Medicine Hokkaido University Hospital Sapporo Hokkaido Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2139-5059
Yuki OgawaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine Sapporo Hokkaido Japan.
Masatake MatsuokaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine Sapporo Hokkaido Japan.
Koji IwasakiDepartment of Functional Reconstruction for the Knee Joint Hokkaido University Sapporo Hokkaido Japan.
Tomohiro OnoderaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine Sapporo Hokkaido Japan.
Yoshitaka OdaDepartment of Cancer Pathology, Faculty of Medicine Hokkaido University Sapporo Hokkaido Japan.
Zen-Ichi TaneiDepartment of Cancer Pathology, Faculty of Medicine Hokkaido University Sapporo Hokkaido Japan.
Daisuke MommaCentre for Sports Medicine Hokkaido University Hospital Sapporo Hokkaido Japan.
Shinya TanakaDepartment of Cancer Pathology, Faculty of Medicine Hokkaido University Sapporo Hokkaido Japan.
Kazunori YasudaKnee Research Center Yagi Orthopaedic Hospital Sapporo Hokkaido Japan.
Tomonori YagiKnee Research Center Yagi Orthopaedic Hospital Sapporo Hokkaido Japan.
Norimasa IwasakiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine Sapporo Hokkaido Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Atelocollagen-associated autologous chondrocyte implantation (A-ACI) with periosteal coverage shows favourable outcomes for large knee cartilage defects but is associated with complications such as graft hypertrophy. Collagen membrane coverage remains under-investigated in this technique. This study aimed to evaluate periosteal versus collagen membrane coverage using clinical, radiological, arthroscopic and histological assessments. Methods: Between 2014 and 2022, patients with ≥4.0 cm Results: Both groups demonstrated significant clinical improvement at 24 months without significant between-group differences. MOCART 2.0 scores were significantly higher in the collagen membrane group at 12 and 24 months (83 vs. 60 at 24 months, Conclusions: The primary clinical outcomes improved similarly in both groups at two years without meaningful between-group superiority. While collagen membrane coverage was associated with higher MOCART 2.0 scores after adjustment for concomitant osteotomy, all structural evaluations should be regarded strictly as secondary and exploratory. Level of Evidence: Level III.

Indexed as

autologous chondrocyte implantationcartilage defectcollagen membranehistological evaluationperiosteum

Identifiers

PMID42799521
PMCPMC13614688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.