ReviewCureus2026
Cluster Headache: Economic and Psychological Burdens of Diagnostic Errors and Delays.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cluster headache (CH) is a devastating primary headache disorder and is widely recognized as one of the most severe pain conditions encountered in clinical practice. The goal of this narrative review is to examine the challenges contributing to the delayed recognition and diagnosis of CH. We divided the cost of CH into direct and indirect costs. We found that direct costs include healthcare services, such as emergency department, primary care, and specialist visits, diagnostic tests, pharmacy services, oxygen therapy, and neuromodulation devices, and increased healthcare utilization, including more frequent emergency department visits. Indirect costs include such invisible burdens of the disease as pain, demoralization, and suicide risk. Despite the cyclic nature of the disease, CH is a chronically disabling disease that impacts patients even during periods of remission. Misdiagnosis is common, particularly among female patients. Diagnostic delays often impede initiation of optimal treatment. Reducing diagnostic delays will require educating clinicians who may encounter patients suffering from CH, including those in primary care, emergency medicine, pain management, neurology, otolaryngology, and dentistry. To address misdiagnosis, it is recommended to incorporate the Erwin Test for Cluster Headache (ETCH) into clinical practice and healthcare professional education to support earlier recognition and improve diagnostic accuracy. Collaboration among healthcare professionals, patient advocacy organizations, and patients themselves, together with improved diagnostic tools and expanded access to care, may increase awareness, reduce diagnostic delays, and improve patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.