Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42799507›Full record

ReviewCureus2026

Cluster Headache: Economic and Psychological Burdens of Diagnostic Errors and Delays.

Vera Gibb, Amber E High

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Vera GibbSchool of Nursing, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, USA.
Amber E HighAnesthesiology, School of Nursing, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cluster headache (CH) is a devastating primary headache disorder and is widely recognized as one of the most severe pain conditions encountered in clinical practice. The goal of this narrative review is to examine the challenges contributing to the delayed recognition and diagnosis of CH. We divided the cost of CH into direct and indirect costs. We found that direct costs include healthcare services, such as emergency department, primary care, and specialist visits, diagnostic tests, pharmacy services, oxygen therapy, and neuromodulation devices, and increased healthcare utilization, including more frequent emergency department visits. Indirect costs include such invisible burdens of the disease as pain, demoralization, and suicide risk. Despite the cyclic nature of the disease, CH is a chronically disabling disease that impacts patients even during periods of remission. Misdiagnosis is common, particularly among female patients. Diagnostic delays often impede initiation of optimal treatment. Reducing diagnostic delays will require educating clinicians who may encounter patients suffering from CH, including those in primary care, emergency medicine, pain management, neurology, otolaryngology, and dentistry. To address misdiagnosis, it is recommended to incorporate the Erwin Test for Cluster Headache (ETCH) into clinical practice and healthcare professional education to support earlier recognition and improve diagnostic accuracy. Collaboration among healthcare professionals, patient advocacy organizations, and patients themselves, together with improved diagnostic tools and expanded access to care, may increase awareness, reduce diagnostic delays, and improve patient outcomes.

Indexed as

cluster headachediagnostic delaydiagnostic errorheadache disordersheadache medicinepatient advocacyprimary headache disorderssuicide headachesuicide risktrigeminal autonomic cephalalgia

Identifiers

PMID42799507
PMCPMC13614504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.