ArticleCureus2026
Stress Fracture Risk in Military Trainees Is Associated With Modifiable Lifestyle and Training Factors: A Retrospective Case-Control Study.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction/Objectives Stress fractures are a common and debilitating injury in military populations. Early identification of risk factors is critical for prevention. The purpose of this study was to identify demographic, clinical, lifestyle, and training-related factors associated with stress fractures in military trainees and to characterize their anatomical distribution. Methods A retrospective case-control study was conducted at King Hussein Medical City from January 2021 to June 2023, including 600 military trainees (139 with stress fractures and 461 controls). Data collected included age, gender, training duration, prior conditioning, smoking status, vitamin D and calcium levels, previous joint injuries, and footwear usage. Statistical analysis was used to determine factors significantly associated with stress fracture risk (p < 0.05). Fracture locations were descriptively analyzed. Results The fracture group was younger (21.78 ± 3.70 vs 24.50 ± 3.33 years) and presented earlier in training (12.1 ± 1.2 days vs. 30.4 ± 22.5 days). They had higher rates of military shoe usage (70.5% vs. 23%), smoking history (64.03% vs. 20.4%), and lower vitamin D levels (26.63 ± 16.56 vs. 42.97 ± 13.75 ng/mL) (all p < 0.001). The most common fracture site was the tibial plateau (43.2%), and 23.0% of cases involved multiple sites. Most fractures (80.6%) were high-grade (Fredericson Grade 3 or 4). Conclusion In this retrospective case-control study, stress fracture occurrence among military trainees was significantly associated with younger age, the early phase of military training, vitamin D deficiency, smoking, use of standard-issue military footwear, and lack of prior physical training. These findings should be interpreted as associations and warrant confirmation in prospective studies with multivariable analyses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.