ArticleACS physical chemistry Au2026
Efficient Organic Molecular Crystal Structure Prediction Using the Density Functional Tight-Binding Method.
Article in ACS physical chemistry Au, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Over the years, computational crystal structure prediction (CSP) for organic molecules has thrived as an area of research, spanning various scientific disciplines and having significant applications in industries such as pharmaceuticals and agrochemicals. Within the field of batteries, redox-active organic materials (ROMs) such as quinones have received increased attention as promising electrode materials for rechargeable batteries. However, experimental determination of the crystal structure of intermediate species formed during the discharge/charge cycle can often be challenging. Incomplete X-ray diffraction patterns can also lead to difficulties in crystal structure determination for ROMs used in batteries. Use of a semiempirical electronic structure method for CSP helps to avoid force field reparameterization for different species, sometimes with complex electronic structure, formed during battery operation. It also helps to significantly lower the computational cost compared to the widely used density functional theory (DFT). In this study, we report the success of a CSP algorithm based on a combination of the particle swarm optimization method, as implemented in the CALYPSO software, with third-order density functional tight-binding, a DFT-based semiempirical method. Accompanied by data postprocessing using DFT, this method enables the correct identification of the most stable crystal structures of organic molecules with different kinds of intermolecular interactions ranging from hydrogen bonding to π-stacking. We also report the experimental crystal structure of pyrene-4,5,9,10-tetrone, a molecule studied intensively for application in organic batteries, and predict its crystal structure correctly using our method. Our findings emphasize the potential of this approach for CSP of different classes of organic molecules, including quinones. Additionally, they establish the foundation for future CSP studies of other organic molecules utilized in rechargeable batteries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.