SynthesisCardiovascular therapeutics2026
Comparing Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement to Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair in Mitral Regurgitation: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Cardiovascular therapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMitral regurgitation affects 2% of the population globally, with a widely increasing prevalence. Although mitral regurgitation is most commonly corrected by open surgery, there has been a recent shift toward less invasive transcatheter approaches, including both transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) and transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR).
methodsA comprehensive literature search was conducted using four databases: PubMed, Cochrane Library, Virtual Health Library (VHL), and Web of Science (WOS), following the PRISMA guidelines. Relevant observational studies were assessed for reporting using STROBE guidelines, whereas case reports were assessed using CARE guidelines. Independent reviewers evaluated studies based on eligibility criteria and analyzed relevant studies.
resultsPostoperative complications observed in patients undergoing either technique (TMVR or TEER) included acute kidney injury, stroke, access site complications, and postoperative bleeding. These complications were generally more frequent in patients after TMVR. Myocardial infarction, prosthesis malposition, and valve migration were reported exclusively after TMVR, whereas ischemic cardiomyopathy was associated with TEER. Regarding hemodynamic outcomes, TMVR patients were associated with greater MR reduction to ≤ 1, frequently observed complete MR resolution, near-laminar blood flow, and marked improvement in left ventricular function (assessed using LVEDVI and LVESVI). TMVR was associated with significantly higher 30-day mortality, whereas pooled 1-year mortality did not differ significantly between TMVR and TEER.
conclusionAlthough TEER remains the safer option in appropriately selected patients, TMVR offers greater efficacy in MR resolution at the cost of higher procedural risk. However, findings should be interpreted with caution, given that patient selection between TMVR and TEER patients may influence observed outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.