ArticleFASEB bioAdvances2026
Beyond Algorithmic Phase Transitions: Integrating Evolutionary Contingency, Biophysical Constraints, and System-Level Organization in Eukaryogenesis.
Article in FASEB bioAdvances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Understanding the origins and determinants of biological complexity requires integrating theoretical and empirical perspectives across the tree of life. The present work discusses a recent theoretical proposal suggesting that the emergence of eukaryotes can be understood as an algorithmic phase transition governed by universal scaling laws in gene structure. The model identifies broad regularities including protein length stabilization and increased regulatory complexity. The predicted stabilization of protein length around 500 amino acids (~1500 bp), coinciding with the prokaryote-to-eukaryote transition, represents a distinctive strength of the proposed framework. Drawing on evolutionary theory, this analysis highlights the importance of historical contingency, natural selection, and stochastic processes in shaping biological complexity. At the same time, biophysical, biochemical, and evolutionary mechanisms may contribute to constraining protein length, although these mechanisms do not currently explain the specific ~500-amino-acid threshold predicted by the phase-transition model. More broadly, complexity emerges from the interplay between evolutionary dynamics, physical constraints, and system-level organization. Factors such as epistasis, epigenetic regulation, population dynamics, gene-environment interactions, and ecological dynamics contribute to shaping evolutionary trajectories and constraining possible outcomes. This perspective therefore proposes an integrative framework in which phenomenological scaling relationships, mechanistic constraints, evolutionary dynamics, and historical contingency are viewed as complementary levels of explanation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.