ArticleEuropean heart journal. Case reports2026
Aortopathy: limitations of diameter-based decision-making: a case report.
Article in European heart journal. Case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Thoracic aortic aneurysms are often incidental findings that require close follow-up monitoring and eventual surgical or endovascular treatment to prevent life-threatening dissection. Their complex relationship with physical activity requires further research to balance cardiovascular risk reduction against the dangers of acute blood pressure peaks. Case summary: A 75-year-old male endurance athlete was evaluated in a sports cardiology clinic to assess the safety of intensive exercise with a known ascending thoracic aortic aneurysm (ATAA). He had adopted an active lifestyle at 65 and completed over thirty 70.3 Ironman races. In 2019, at the age of 75, echocardiography revealed an ATAA measuring 52 mm, along with a bicuspid aortic valve and moderate regurgitation. The patient declined surgery and wished to continue endurance training. After shared decision-making, continued training and racing were allowed under predefined limits for blood pressure and heart rate, with regular imaging surveillance. Over 6 years of follow-up using magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and echocardiography, aneurysm size remained stable, with an aortic wall thickness of 2.5 mm. Based on Laplace's law, the calculated circumferential wall stress stayed below rupture thresholds during exercise. Exercise counselling should consider not only aneurysm diameter but also blood pressure, wall thickness, and wall stress. Discussion: In accordance with current guidelines, watchful waiting and a temporary restriction of physical activity are recommended in this case of aortic dilatation. However, because factors such as increased aortic wall thickness may allow for a more favourable distribution of wall stress, an individualized risk assessment can refine these recommendations. In the present case, a shared decision-making approach revealed that controlled physical exertion did not critically increase wall stress and potentially conferred a long-term protective effect against aneurysm progression, underscoring the value of individualized therapeutic strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.