ArticleCureus2026
Prescription Trends in the Management of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms in Men: An Online Survey of Indian Urologists.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), highly prevalent among aging men, adversely affect the quality of life. Pharmacological management has evolved with multiple drug classes, but real-world prescribing patterns in India have not been adequately studied. Thus, we evaluated prescription trends among Indian urologists for the management of male LUTS, assessed symptom patterns, evaluated factors influencing choice of fixed-dose combination (FDC), with special focus on silodosin-mirabegron FDC, and identified adverse events (AEs) and adherence. Methods This cross-sectional, questionnaire-based survey was performed over three months (January 2, 2026, to April 5, 2026) and included 110 Indian urologists actively managing male patients with LUTS. A 27-item structured questionnaire captured demographic characteristics, clinical practice patterns, and prescribing preferences for LUTS pharmacotherapy, including monotherapies, combination therapies, and FDCs, along with AEs and adherence. Results Of 135 urologists invited, 110 (81.48%) completed the survey. LUTS mainly involved a combination of storage, voiding, and post-micturition symptoms (n = 59, 53.6%). As a class, α1-blockers were the most frequently prescribed monotherapy (n = 109, 99.1% frequent/very frequent use), with silodosin (n = 98, 89.1%) and tamsulosin (n = 84, 76.4%) being most preferred. Use of dutasteride (n = 108, 98.2%) exceeded finasteride (n = 13, 11.8%). In patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) with overactive bladder, silodosin-mirabegron was the most favored FDC (n = 97, 88.2%). FDCs of α1-blockers with muscarinic receptor antagonists and β-3 adrenergic agonists were preferred due to their proven efficacies (n = 83, 75.5% and n = 87, 79.1%, respectively) and lower incidences of AEs (n = 69, 62.7% and n = 80, 72.7%). Common AEs included dry mouth (n = 73, 66.4%), anejaculation (n = 69, 62.7%), and headache (n = 67, 60.9%). Moderate adherence (25%-75%) was reported by 95 (86.4%) urologists. Conclusion Adherence to pharmacotherapy, as assessed by participating urologists, was moderate, with urologists preferring silodosin as first-line therapy and silodosin-mirabegron FDC for mixed LUTS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.