ArticleEuropean heart journal. Case reports2026
The many faces of atrioventricular block in myocarditis: a case series and proposed clinical strategy highlighting cardiovascular magnetic resonance-guided diagnosis, device selection, and disease monitoring.
Article in European heart journal. Case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Atrioventricular (AV) conduction disorders are a relatively rare complication in acute myocarditis. Although frequently transient in nature, persistent AV block has been reported. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging is critical in the diagnostic work-up and follow-up of myocarditis. This case series describes the use of CMR imaging to guide diagnosis, device selection, and disease monitoring. Case Summary: Four patients with complete AV block due to acute myocarditis underwent serial CMR imaging for diagnosis, disease monitoring, and device timing and selection. Recovery of AV conduction was variable in the presented cases. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging was able to identify two distinct clinical scenarios of disease progress and subsequent AV conduction recovery: first, two patients (Cases 1 and 2) in which resolution of myocardial inflammation was paralleled by resolution of AV conduction disorders and, second, a patient (Case 3) in which AV block persisted even after resolution of inflammation due to the development of myocardial fibrosis. However, in one patient (Case 4), CMR was unable to adequately detect the disease progress, i.e. a patient with persistent AV block despite resolution of inflammation and no signs of myocardial fibrosis. Discussion: This case series illustrates the variable clinical course of AV conduction disorders in the context of acute myocarditis. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging was essential in the identification of underlying myocarditis, offering insights in the disease course, and may therefore be used as an adjunctive tool for device selection. However, mismatch between CMR findings and AV conduction disorders may occur and warrants further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.