ReviewInternational journal of women's health2026
Endometrial Preparation Strategies for Frozen Embryo Transfer in Women with Adenomyosis: A Systematic Review of Hormone Replacement Therapy, Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Agonist, and Oxytocin Antagonists.
Review in International journal of women's health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Adenomyosis is associated with impaired reproductive outcomes, including reduced implantation potential, lower pregnancy rates, and increased miscarriage risk. Despite the widespread use of frozen embryo transfer (FET), the optimal endometrial preparation strategy for women with adenomyosis remains uncertain. Purpose: This systematic review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of different endometrial preparation strategies, including hormone replacement therapy (HRT), gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa)-based protocols, and oxytocin receptor antagonist therapy, in women with adenomyosis undergoing FET. Methods: A systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. PubMed, Cochrane, Oxford, Scopus, and Wiley databases were searched until November 2024. Randomized controlled trials and comparative observational studies evaluating endometrial preparation strategies in women with adenomyosis undergoing FET were included. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool for randomized controlled trials and ROBINS-I for observational studies. Results: Seven studies were included, consisting of one randomized controlled trial and six observational cohort studies. The randomized trial found no significant differences in clinical pregnancy, chemical pregnancy, miscarriage, or live birth rates between HRT with GnRHa pretreatment and HRT alone. In contrast, several observational studies suggested that long-term GnRHa down-regulation combined with HRT may improve implantation, clinical pregnancy, ongoing pregnancy, and live birth outcomes, particularly in selected patients with more severe adenomyosis characteristics. Oxytocin receptor antagonist administration was associated with a lower early miscarriage rate. Conclusion: GnRHa-based endometrial preparation, particularly long-term down-regulation, may provide potential benefits for selected women with adenomyosis undergoing FET, although randomized evidence remains inconclusive. Oxytocin receptor antagonist therapy may reduce early miscarriage risk, but further studies are required. Additional randomized controlled trials are needed to establish optimal GnRHa duration, patient selection criteria, and standardized treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.