Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42799204›Full record

ReviewPolymer science & technology (Washington, D.C.)2026

Advancements in Functional Polymeric Scaffolds for Scar-Free Skin Regeneration.

Glen See, Hashem Saker, Iyad A Hammam, Kayla Mitchell, Cristian Ragland, Zhongkui Hong

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Polymer science & technology (Washington, D.C.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Glen SeeDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas 79409, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-9452-584X
Hashem SakerDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas 79409, United States.
Iyad A HammamDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas 79409, United States.
Kayla MitchellDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas 79409, United States.
Cristian RaglandDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas 79409, United States.
Zhongkui HongDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas 79409, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1745-6488

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Skin tissue engineering offers a promising approach to improving wound healing outcomes, with polymeric scaffolds playing a critical role in guiding tissue regeneration and minimizing scar formation. This review summarizes recent advancements in polymeric scaffold design for skin tissue engineering, specifically emphasizing strategies that promote functional regeneration rather than fibrotic repair. Key aspects discussed include scaffold architecture, polymer selection, and fabrication techniques that influence cellular behavior, extracellular matrix (ECM) deposition, and mechanical integration with the host tissue. The review highlights how natural, synthetic, and composite polymer systems can be engineered to modulate inflammation, support cell adhesion and differentiation, and facilitate organized tissue remodeling. Translational considerations are examined, including cell-seeding approaches and the role of cellular self-organization in supporting the regeneration of skin appendages and restoring the native tissue architecture. Currently available skin substitutes are critically evaluated, revealing persistent limitations in achieving a scar-free healing. Emerging fabrication technologies, particularly three-dimensional printing, electrospinning, and artificial intelligence-guided design, are all discussed for their potential to enhance scaffold precision and regenerative performance. Overall, this review underscores the importance of continued innovation in polymer chemistry, materials engineering, and bioprinting to enable the development of next-generation skin scaffolds that support scar-free skin regeneration.

Indexed as

commercial skin substitutesfunctionalized biomaterialspolymeric scaffoldsscar-free skin regenerationskin appendagestissue engineeringwound healing

Identifiers

PMID42799204
PMCPMC13614170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.