ReviewHealth science reports2026
The Role of Ultra-Low-Dose Naloxone as an Additive in Anesthesia and Nerve Block: A Systematic Review.
Review in Health science reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: In anesthesia and analgesia, opioids alone or in combination with local anesthetics (bupivacaine, lidocaine, and ropivacaine) have been investigated to prolong peripheral nerve blocks. Ultra-low-dose naloxone administration in local anesthetic solutions could lengthen sensory and motor blocks through enhanced opioid effects or direct antagonistic effects on the receptors. We aim to assess the role of ultra-low-dose naloxone as an additive in anesthesia duration, motor, and sensory block duration, visual analog scale (VAS) scores, opioid consumption, and the incidence of postoperative complications. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed/Medline, Ovid Embase, and Web of Science up to November 23rd, 2023, and 840 records were retrieved and screened. Accordingly, seven randomized controlled trials met the eligibility criteria and were included for data extraction. The National Institute of Health's (NIH) Quality Assessment Tool for Clinical Trials was used for critical appraisal of the studies. Results: The effects of ultra-low-dose naloxone on intravenous regional anesthesia and various nerve blocks (including axillary and supraclavicular brachial plexus, peribulbar, femoral, and intercostal nerve block) were assessed. The administration of naloxone at doses of 100 and 50 ng as an additive to bupivacaine, lidocaine, and ropivacaine was associated with longer postoperative analgesia, prolonged motor and/or sensory block, lower postoperative opioid or analgesic consumption, and lower VAS pain scores in several included studies. Besides, in most studies, postoperative complications did not significantly differ between the groups. Conclusion: The available evidence suggests that ultra-low-dose naloxone may be associated with prolonged postoperative analgesia and, in some studies, longer motor and/or sensory block duration and reduced postoperative opioid consumption. These findings should be interpreted as observations reported by individual studies rather than definitive treatment effects. Although no major safety concerns were identified, the available evidence is insufficient to establish the overall safety or efficacy of ultra-low-dose naloxone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.